So, word has it, that the CEO of Overstock.com got himself into a bit of trouble with a foreign crime influence. It has to do with naked short selling a stock. A normal short sell occurs when a person who believes a stock will go down, borrows a stock from a brokerage and sells it on the open market, hoping the price will fall so they can buy it back at a lower price. The practice known as naked short selling is only done by very few illegitimate brokers who violate Securities and Exchange Commission's regulations when doing so. They allow their clients to sell a stock on the open market without any sort of liability (they don't have to borrow it from anyone). Supposedly, this is a common practice done by the Israeli and Russian mafias to make something happen their way. Now, this could be all one big coincidence because a lot of companies claim they are a victim of naked short selling. They take major offense to this practice because when you don't borrow a security before shorting it, you create artificial supply in the marketplace, causing the underlying stock to shoot down. But, Overstock has made the top of the list of naked short selling consistently over the past number of months, and the CEO has made an appoint to exclaim to the media that his stock is a victim of this practice. I am an avid follower business news, and I have never heard of a CEO claiming this. This leaves this particular problem with one of two answers. One, somehow and for some reason, the underground powers that be, put a copy of the Wall Street Journal on the wall, fired a dart at the paper, unfortunately landing the poor Overstock symbol and decided to target them. Or, the most logical conclusion, the CEO or one of the other leaders of the company somehow got in trouble with one these underground crime heads. Why? Maybe the CEO made an illegitimate pass at a Russian Don's wife. Doubtful. What if one of the heads of these organizations asked one of the leaders of Overstock to list something of enormous value that really didn't exist. Let me explain. When you list an item, no matter how expensive, on a site like Overstock or Ebay , they never ask for any kind of confirmation that the enormously expensive item ever exists. When the auction ends, the buyer goes and pays, usually through a credit card gateway like PayPal. Overstock never knows what was sold and PayPal doesn't know what was actually bought. This seems like a great way to launder money to me. Imagine a situation where bad guy A has drugs to sell, and bad guy B wants to buy. Bad guy A would go onto Overstock.com, take a false picture of an antique wardrobe, and start the biding at $10,000. Bad guy B bids that lucky $10,000 and wins the auction. Bad guy B would than pay for this non-existent wardrobe via PayPal W/ A CREDIT CARD! They have now exchanged clean money in terms of Overstock or Ebay. Now, these bad guys don't have to worry about ceilings or lakes to put their cash in. They have the ability to pay for their illegal substances via PayPal or its equivalent with a credit card and make monthly payments on their Coke. Now, back to the topic at hand. What if one of these figures came to the CEO and gave him an "enormous business opportunity" that couldn't be refused. It would be the type of situation that relates to a scenario I described above. Now, keep in mind Overstock has been plagued with increasing losses with no end in sight (They need a new business prospect to keep them afloat). The CEO probably refused because he's probably a legitimate businessman. So, these Mafia types went to the most calloused of brokers and started this practice of naked short selling. Because of this, Overstock has lost at least $4 billion in market capitalization. Would you rather lose $4 billion or get the old cement shoes.
posted by Stock Administrator at
1:06 AM Tuesday, February 07, 2006
GOOG and DELL In Talks
It was announced today that Google and Dell are in talks to strike a deal. Google would be willing to shell out $1billion over the next three years for Dell to implant Google's toolbar and software used to search the hard drive into Dell's research computer system. This is a growing trend used by computer makers to sell space to software providers. Now, the next big question. Why is Google down so sharply today? It seems to me that Google is beginning to go down the same path as Mr. Softy (Microsoft), implementing their own software into a big chunck of the computer market. Could this step be the next trend for Google? Will they evolve into the software conglomerate that Microsoft is? We all know they have the cash and the vision to do so. In addition, I've been hearing some rumors about a Google PAYPAL alternative. This completely makes sense because GOOG is in the process of coming out with a section that competes with EBAY. And, because PAYPAL is an Ebay owned company, the only logical thing to do is to give those who buy on Google the ability to pay for the item through a company owned by Google. Give me your consensus.