Ottulo of the present article suggests a reflection on a subject that, comumente, is treated in the Brazilian public administration as doubtless umaverdade, in which would not fit any type dequestionamento. However, making a more refined analysis, one perceives that this premise is not supported and can be sendoutilizada as curtain to hide one me the public management of purchases and decontratos. We will be able to enumerate the real reasons that take the public administration to carry through its purchases of inefficient form: Identificaoda necessity: the first step for the one accomplishment compraeficiente says respect to the fact of the user of the material or of the service to aser contracted to know to identify what in fact it needs, that is will queser, it necessary to take care of fully to its necessity. In the prticaeste it is the first pass of the process. To a large extent of the cases osolicitante of the purchase it does not obtain to delimit its necessity, quecoloca at risk the efficiency of the acquisition. In the administration pblicaexiste still an aggravating one, has seen that, almost always, osresponsveis for the conduction of the licitation are not the users produtoou of it will not be the managers of the contract, that is, is unaware of the realnecessidade of the acquisition. Comona Public Administration the controls legally are foreseen and to devemser adopted, fits to find a routine that diminishes the initial risk dese to acquire an item that does not take care of of full form the dosolicitante necessity, has seen that the correct description of the specification doitem to be contracted appears as sine qua non condition for the success of the act of contract, independently of the presence of the solicitant at the moment of the acquisition. Especificaodo to be acquired item: the correct specification of the item is that to vaideterminar the attendance of the necessities of the purchase or not. Richard Elman takes a slightly different approach.
Comments are closed.